Skip to main content

My Response to Christians on Transhumanism

By The Disfactor
The greatest sin of Christianity has been its attempt to maintain "White Male" supremacy at all costs -- even the cost of its own integrity. Is it any wonder why large groups of nonwhite individuals would eventually turn away from God; once they discovered the belligerent flaws within White Christian traditionalism. Thus; how many white Christians or Christians of any race or gender that prescribe to the nonsense of these traditions can be called children of God; let alone saved. "How can you say you love me, whom you have not seen, when you do not love your brother who you have seen". How can you be saved and be a racist! In short, who or what do you love more - God or privilege based upon skin color. If, members of humanity turn away from being human and become Gibbon/Giborim through transhumanism it will be those who have been unwillingly disinvested of their humanity by those who claim to know God, but insist upon degrees of whiteness being a measure of humaness; especially valued humanness. Search this link to discover God's view of racism http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/racism.html

If I am not good enough as I am in my current body; then isn't the fault with God and not myself due to God's creation of my being as a contrast to whiteness. If my creation as a person of color is not of my doing, and is a disgrace to humanity - then shouldn't I search for a means of correcting God's mistake by either removing myself from existence through suicide, which you state is a sin against God, or through genetic manipulation in order to obtain that which you deem to be perfection? If that's the case then how can you stand against transhumanism; let alone my utilization of transhumanism to physically obtain your idea of mental and physical perfection. Search this link to determine if my argument is valid https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4a-WLwkyTM

In order for chattel slavery to be justified as a means of socioenomic development within America, Africans and Afro-descendent individuals had to be considered less than human, they had to be considered animalistic in nature; thus, if transhumanism is combining human and animal genetic materials together in order to create a new species then Am I not as a non-human creature simply attempting to improve upon my genetics by utilizing the genetics of superior species to raise myself to a higher level of mental and physical existence that would enable me to obtain self-sufficiency, determinism and self determined identity. If, transhumanism is a sin - then it is not a sin that I am in danger of committing since I am still considered less than human.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Finding Myself in the Story of Race | Debby Irving | TEDx Fenway

By The Disfactor
Post a Comment
Read more

Why African-Americans left the south in droves — and what's bringing the...

By The Disfactor
It's important to realize the dates listed. It's through noticing these dates that we begin to realize that this country is not that far removed away from the root of those issues that African Americans still deal with. The 1970's was 48 years ago. Your dad could tell you about it if he was honest rather he was black or white. However; depending on which one he was there might be things he doesn't want to talk about or may not be proud of. It's that recent not that old.
Post a Comment
Read more

Notes on Adorning “Otherness”

By The Disfactor
Picture: By The Atlantic Disfactor art: By Jabram Allen According to David Shariatmadari off the  Guardian “We think we know what a gay person sounds like. But there   are caveats to the cliche — and ‘voice-shaming’ tells us a lot more about our culture than it does about the person speaking” According to Shariatmadari; “the research says probably not. There’s mountains of evidence to suggest we adapt our speech to more closely resemble that of people we identify with. The particular sounds a group of speakers makes use of are arbitrary. They acquire meaning and recognizability only through association. The fact that these changes are usually unconscious is well documented. But, linguistically speaking, sounding gay is really no different from sounding street, sounding posh or sounding like a bro”. In other words, groups develop, practice and telegraph those actions that set them apart from other groups so that they may be intentionally recognized by those that don’t belong to t
Post a Comment
Read more