Skip to main content

Transhumanism & Man Merging With Machine: Progress In 2016

 Is this how the status quo intend to remain the status quo? Every technological advancement that has been stated to be for the benefit of man has always been utilized by the ruling elites to oppress the lower classes and people of color; while further dominating the women of their social classes to be utilized as breeding stock for the male elite of those classes. Frank Herbert, author of Dune;  Philip K Dick, author of Blade Runner; H.P Lovecraft -- the father of modern horror/science fiction through the Cuthulu Mythos and Chiaki J. Konaka Japanese writer and scenarist best known for Serial Experiments Lain, creator of Ultraman Gaia, and Armitage the Third have all pointed out the key element in human socioeconomic development that leads to war, oppression and global poverty -- the elite's inability to prevent their own spiritual corruption. Is the Anti-Christ system not a system of demonic control exercised against humanity by fallen angels and their children, but corrupt elites possessing technologically based demonic powers?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Finding Myself in the Story of Race | Debby Irving | TEDx Fenway

Why African-Americans left the south in droves — and what's bringing the...

It's important to realize the dates listed. It's through noticing these dates that we begin to realize that this country is not that far removed away from the root of those issues that African Americans still deal with. The 1970's was 48 years ago. Your dad could tell you about it if he was honest rather he was black or white. However; depending on which one he was there might be things he doesn't want to talk about or may not be proud of. It's that recent not that old.

Notes on Adorning “Otherness”

Picture: By The Atlantic Disfactor art: By Jabram Allen According to David Shariatmadari off the  Guardian “We think we know what a gay person sounds like. But there   are caveats to the cliche — and ‘voice-shaming’ tells us a lot more about our culture than it does about the person speaking” According to Shariatmadari; “the research says probably not. There’s mountains of evidence to suggest we adapt our speech to more closely resemble that of people we identify with. The particular sounds a group of speakers makes use of are arbitrary. They acquire meaning and recognizability only through association. The fact that these changes are usually unconscious is well documented. But, linguistically speaking, sounding gay is really no different from sounding street, sounding posh or sounding like a bro”. In other words, groups develop, practice and telegraph those actions that set them apart from other groups so that they may be intentionally recognized by those that don’t belong to t